tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9015907.post111103255891046106..comments2023-09-20T03:19:31.111-07:00Comments on 54CR3D 5P4C3: transgressing into theologyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9015907.post-1111423055049065602005-03-21T08:37:00.000-08:002005-03-21T08:37:00.000-08:00remember that part in I [heart] huckabees where he...remember that part in I [heart] huckabees where he has the blanket and he's like this is me, this is you, this is the eiffel tower? well, forget the eiffel tower. but me and you as one? this is what i meant by the post.<BR/><BR/>Love your neighbor AS your SELF. Not as much as, not in the same way, but that you, to some extent, are part of the same SELF - not individually them, but as part of a whole. maybe it's time to use upper case 'I' versus lower case 'i'... big SELF vs little self? if one part of the body is sick... the whole is sick. why punch your SELF in the eye?<BR/><BR/>is the distinction worth making? i think so. it's about a way of seeing things differently. non-individualistically. even non-tribally. one whole.<BR/><BR/>ultimately though, a headless horseman has no reason not to punch himself... he's already headless.joshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06953209731067748756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9015907.post-1111368460509380162005-03-20T17:27:00.000-08:002005-03-20T17:27:00.000-08:00Yoshi, maybe you can explain a little better, yes?...Yoshi, maybe you can explain a little better, yes? Is there a revelatory distinction between 'as yourself' and 'as you love yourself'? Really, what's the big deal? If I love someone the same way I love myself, then how would it change anything if I identified them as part of a collective? I think I'm missing your point.<BR/><BR/>Belligerently, <BR/><BR/>SimonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com